Acer Aspire M5800/M3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5800/M3800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 02:49
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 62.2
36% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 83.1
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.8
19% 20.3 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.2
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
162GB free
Firmware: SC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 124
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
93GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.3
Mixed 106
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.42
104% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 99.7
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.33
68% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 65.6
Mixed 55.9
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 62%
Innostor Ext. HDD 750GB
2GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 19.1
Mixed 14.4
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.18
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5800/M3800 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5800/M3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback