Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4500 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	Memory 5.56 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 81.4 22% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 81.6 8-Core 60.1 10% 70.8 Pts	64-Core 67.1 4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	2.53% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB 12,950 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS4NFXV SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 91 86 96 101 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 451 Write 161 Mixed 221 SusWrite 98.3 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 13.9 50% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 117 88% 117 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 192%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB 20,752 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 447 9% 447 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	543x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	184x
Gen Intel Core i3-1125G411thBench 65%, 1,785 samples	176x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	718x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	320x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	59x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBNvmeBench 157%, 2,402 samples	129x
KBG40ZNV256G KIOXIA 256GBNvmeBench 133%, 1,406 samples	105x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GBNvmeBench 147%, 1,714 samples	88x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	183x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GBHynixBench 71%, 7,522 samples	68x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples	63x