ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crystal X8DTL

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Crystal X8DTL (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8DTL
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '15 at 21:14
Run Duration	1261 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5504 489 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 100 47% 74.1 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295 975 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 062F) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1135 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 127GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 511 Write 179 Mixed 265 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 4.31 28% 8.93 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 8.3 42% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Read 0.91 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.85 1% 0.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.009 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-100.A00LF 9965525-100.A00LF ATMEL 26DF321 52GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 800, 800, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 2 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback