Today's hottest deals

EXO Smart Pro Q7 i5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEXO Smart Pro Q7 i5  (all builds)
MotherboardEXO NJ51MU
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime278 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 18:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 214
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 356
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 8683) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 14.5
9% 11.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 11.1
10% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Casper-512GB 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 268 259 270 271 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 354
Write 276
Mixed 286
SusWrite 266
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 11
64% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 41.7
62% 113 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Smart Pro Q7 i5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: EXO Smart Pro Q7 i5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback