HP ProBook 430 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 430 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8377
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 27.9
1-Core 15.4
2-Core 64
20% 35.8 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 156
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 8377) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme EVM SSD 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 324 387 382 355 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
Read 475
Write 352
Mixed 374
SusWrite 315
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 8.6
35% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 152
114% 149 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 135%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 113 113 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 122
Write 88
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 109
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G5 Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback