Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U9312

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U9312  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2F6
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1265U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 52
2-Core 118
38% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 334
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 009C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 15.6
11% 15.4 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 13.3
13% 16 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDKBA1T0TFK-1BC15ABFA 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 395 391 771 811 815 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 513
Mixed 741
SusWrite 582
149% 662 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 350
225% 261 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMBLHR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 44
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 107%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U9312 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U9312

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback