Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook x360 11 G5 EE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G5 EE  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86CF
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 16:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 34.4
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 86.9
28% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 134
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 86CF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.9
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-8D128-HP 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 102 116 114 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40% Average
Read 301
Write 146
Mixed 177
SusWrite 112
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 13.7
48% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 22.9
50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook x360 11 G5 EE Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G5 EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback