Gigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B360 M AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 04:46
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 689
76% 602 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 66.5
57% 70 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 65.3
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 60 39 27 23 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 410
Write 204
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 59.8
39% 180 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 1.3
46% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 72.8
DQ Write 44.8
DQ Mixed 1.1
16% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 82%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
222GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 524 397 396 396 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 1,099
Mixed 947
SusWrite 541
210% 939 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66
219% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 1,246
DQ Mixed 1,141
855% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 198%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLAG43F-18---------- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.9
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback