Metabox Alpha-SR NP70SNE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMetabox Alpha-SR NP70SNE  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NP5x_6x_7x_SNx
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U29, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 41
2-Core 77.7
32% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 98.1
8-Core 121
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A650) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3954
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 49.3
Parallax 3.4
2% 18.6 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.6
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2241 1TB SSD
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS224C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2820 2725 2906 2937 2969 3053 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 2,671
Mixed 1,873
SusWrite 2,902
508% 2,227 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 45.1
146% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 249
186% 250 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 292%
Great: 452%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ACPI Digital Co Ltd 7D500309 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.9
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 195
21% 195 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Alpha-SR NP70SNE Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Metabox Alpha-SR NP70SNE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback