HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 12:03
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 555
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 32.4
20% 28.5 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 20
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 120GB SATA SSD 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0916A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 376 71 44 41 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 411
Write 393
Mixed 285
SusWrite 156
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 28.4
125% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 47.3
88% 170 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48
55GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 101
Write 32.8
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 68.2
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback