MSI MS-17F6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10UD
MotherboardMSI MS-17F6  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 254
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 582
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 82
Parallax 6.6
5% 31.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 1093 329 331 331 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 250
Write 732
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 431
81% 356 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 12.4
45% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 798
591% 782 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 211%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
169GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 72 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 99.7
Write 87.9
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 70.3
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F6 Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback