HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8259
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 16:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 33.6
32% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 300
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 8.6
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PeM280240GP4C15B 240GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 172 218 194 189 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 671
Write 174
Mixed 231
SusWrite 185
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 15.1
62% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 221
193% 295 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 186%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
342GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 69.6
Write 51.3
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 78.3
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 19
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback