Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 20:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 107
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 356
34% 280 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.25
9% 11 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 14.9
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 290
Write 221
Mixed 234
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 18.1
94% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 14.8
23% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
226GB free
Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 101
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.49
109% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8G-D3-1600-MR 8G-D3-1600-MR 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback