HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B4E
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 22.7
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 153
46% 90 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 194
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B4E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.7
5% 9.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 707 841 797 825 834 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 634
Write 660
Mixed 679
SusWrite 776
156% 687 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 32.2
110% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 320
226% 292 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 0.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 301
13% 301 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback