AZW U59

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW U59  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U59
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 18:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 141
53% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 140
23% 162 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nt-2tb 2280 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12574
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 346
Mixed 364
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 221
178% 250 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.5% Above average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U59 Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback