Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 18:55
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 136
52% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 268
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 42.7
48% 65 fps
MRender 89
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 46.1
49% 62.9 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 PRO 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200V9KL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1632 1501 1457 1525 1519 1382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 2,339
Mixed 2,052
SusWrite 1,503
469% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 70.3
231% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 471
332% 425 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 280%
Great: 523%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
323GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 337 355 346 323 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 325
Write 393
Mixed 351
SusWrite 312
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 28.8
106% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 151
156% 255 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
671GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 170 170 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 78.9
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 167
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
294GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 97 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 126
Mixed 83
SusWrite 94
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 74%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 27 26 31 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 200
Write 32.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 28.2
69% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
35% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RamCENTER 16D2666CL190M 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.1% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 27.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660M GAMING X AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback