Today's hottest deals

Jingsha X99M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemJingsha X99M-H  (all builds)
Motherboard X99-D4
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 763
68% 577 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 145
Parallax 205
100% 158 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 140
Splatting 92.7
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb MEGA S3 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 132 138 123 348 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,359
Write 1,051
Mixed 931
SusWrite 249
200% 897 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 25.3
137% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 337
279% 395 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 129%
Great: 495%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
797GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 178 175 178 174 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 153
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 175
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLF62F-D8---------- GLLF62F-D8---------- D12.2324CS.003 GLLF62F-D8---------- 20GB
2400, 2400, 2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 31.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M-H Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

System: Jingsha X99M-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback