Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 20.4 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 151 39% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 212 22% 178 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.03% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 4 Parallax 6.4 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 9.7 6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.03% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CV8-8E256 256GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: C280904 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 239 164 237 247 260 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 353 Write 296 Mixed 224 SusWrite 227 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 17.8 68% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 174 139% 195 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GSAH22F-18KIH5-HHFV- 1x16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 317 13% 317 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	30x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples	2x

RAM
AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 1,420 samples	25x
GSAH22F-18KIH5-HHFV- 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 15 samples	3x
GKE160SO102408-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 46%, 1,111 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16