Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory14.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 124
59% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 159
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 3.5
5% 3.57 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 150 136 128 259 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 743
Write 104
Mixed 442
SusWrite 202
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 27.6
85% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 181
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
872GB free
Firmware: HPH5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 186 181 175 172 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 94.5
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 178
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 9.3
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback