MSI MS-16GC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2OC\2OD\2OE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GC  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 06:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 4.5
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 104
28% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 260
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
MSI(1462 10E0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 19.6
12% 15.8 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 14.3
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 386 377 339 346 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 308
Write 299
Mixed 262
SusWrite 353
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 20.4
67% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 210
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 458
9% 458 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GC Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback