Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 78 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 129 58% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 167 21% 162 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1094) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 6.1 4% 7.5 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/960G 960GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2428F SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 174 246 157 311 323 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 332 Write 274 Mixed 252 SusWrite 224 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 7.5 61% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 12.8 65% 145 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-B2NS 1x8GB 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.4% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 84.3 48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,552x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	607x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples	584x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	281x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	113x
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples	89x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples	397x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	137x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples	119x