Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1040 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 14:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6354
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
67% 129 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 368
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 14DA) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 145GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 772
Write 288
Mixed 397
106% 486 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 10.6
37% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 291
221% 296 MB/s
Nutanix VDISK 32GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 262 249 257 254 249 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 78% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 81.1
MC Mixed 27.9
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 10
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 109%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback