Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 08:16
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 583
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
PNY(196E 138E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 92.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 112
75% 105 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 95
Splatting 80.9
81% 101 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 512GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82C6U67A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1818 1011 383 447 470 473 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 2,084
Mixed 1,606
SusWrite 767
387% 1,736 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 87.1
288% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 764
564% 747 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 269%
Great: 388%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
157GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 425 286 290 430 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 324
Write 105
Mixed 304
SusWrite 359
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 36.8
143% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 225
197% 290 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93%
Great: 104%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
84GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 214 81 80 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 473
Mixed 435
SusWrite 163
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 46.4
164% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 128%
Lexar NS100 512GB
231GB free
Firmware: SN13132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 413 416 418 414 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 468
Mixed 444
SusWrite 417
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 41.1
150% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 294
218% 285 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
158GB free
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 345 351 346 349 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 351
Mixed 338
SusWrite 347
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 53.4
176% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 459
305% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE 3000 C16 Series BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE 24GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 35.1
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 32.9
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback