ECS A300-SF110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemECS LIVA One A300
MotherboardECS A300-SF110  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 16:03
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 68.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,011
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,237
76% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Elitegroup(1019 AE0F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 38
21% 28.3 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 23.6
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 319 305 306 306 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,337
Write 1,342
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 451
297% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 63.6
207% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,014
750% 985 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 28.3
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A300-SF110 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS A300-SF110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 141% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback