Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '16 at 22:45
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 78.7
47% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 79.8
10% 77.8 Pts
64-Core 80.8
5% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
ASRock(1849 9993) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 2.25
2% 3.06 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn_ 850X1Ultra_128GB 128GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R081 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 427
Mixed 474
104% 468 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 79.3
88% 149 MB/s
Samsung MCCOE64G8MPP-0VA 64GB
22GB free
Firmware: PS10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 108
Write 91.2
Mixed 95.8
22% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 5.72
4K Mixed 5.46
39% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Samsung MCCOE64G8MPP-0VA 64GB
6GB free
Firmware: PS10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 108
Write 92.7
Mixed 98
22% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 5.41
4K Mixed 5.55
39% 10 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback