Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 07:14
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 116
44% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 175
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 68.8
36% 56.4 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 44.4
32% 38 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 114 139 142 179 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 649
Mixed 714
SusWrite 146
126% 564 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 39.5
124% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 281
211% 284 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 210%
Aosenke 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 2205XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 115 133 140 166 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 317
Write 173
Mixed 229
SusWrite 140
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 22.5
81% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 126
103% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
857GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 4.3 6.6 7.4 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 18 16 16 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1B1 HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1B1 16GB
2132, 2132, 2132, 2132 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 9.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback