Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG Strix G733QR_G733QR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G733QR_G733QR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G733QR
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 08:13
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 992
96% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 10BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 231
Parallax 162
141% 189 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 127
Splatting 122
117% 147 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 10BC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.19
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 35.5
22% 28.2 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 23.9
19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 1376 1387 1345 1290 1321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,807
SusWrite 1,343
448% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 86
283% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 1004
DQ Mixed 1,100
822% 1,095 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 317%
Great: 355%
Colorful CN700 4TB PRO
4TB free
Firmware: H230523a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2641 2599 2560 2430 2409 2410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 2,791
Write 2,710
Mixed 2,421
SusWrite 2,508
588% 2,607 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 97.4
322% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,488
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 1,077
898% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 428%
This bench: 428%
Great: 614%
WD Elements SE 2622 4TB
634GB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 113 111 111 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 66.1
Write 67.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 111
103% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 28.6
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Strix G733QR_G733QR Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ROG Strix G733QR_G733QR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback