GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 59.7
1-Core 195
2-Core 372
106% 209 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,023
105% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1E50 8018) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.40.62
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 63.9
30% 41.5 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 62.6
40% 46.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE980Y38900-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10191
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,885
Write 4,341
Mixed 3335
862% 3,854 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 92.1
311% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,621
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 1,312
1,012% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 290% Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 69.6
MC Mixed 47.8
159% 55.7 GB/s
SC Read 43.3
SC Write 59.1
SC Mixed 54
149% 52.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 10.1" 1280 720 JDI0031 GPD1001H
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 241% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback