Gigabyte GA-P35V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P35V2  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '16 at 22:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 45.1
33% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 251
20% 179 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Gigabyte(1458 B556) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5560
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 3.59
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 486
Write 334
Mixed 349
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 14.8
68% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 56.6
55% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 126%
Liteonit LMT-128M6M 128GB
24GB free
Firmware: DM73402 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 494
Write 306
Mixed 370
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 16.2
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 72
70% 111 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G1600L2S Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P35V2 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback