Lenovo 10SQ002LUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 10SQ002LUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 791
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 312A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.8
0% 6.07 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 229
Mixed 197
63% 288 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 28.8
102% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 191
154% 223 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 97%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
62GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 195
Mixed 76
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 10TB
643GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 213
Write 213
Mixed 122
135% 182 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.6
385% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 115%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 3TB
583GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 89.4
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 110%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
345GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 92
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 100%
SABRENT 2TB
165GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 326
Mixed 191
170% 228 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 22.4
3,862% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 42.8
648% 100 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 3TB
307GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 129
Mixed 88.5
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 0702 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN60C9 LEN T2454pA
Typical 10SQ002LUK Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10SQ002LUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback