Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory34.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 131
56% 92 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 395
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 2.9
6% 5.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TS1TMTE240S 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3TD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 317 290 316 312 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1689
Write 1,373
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 394
269% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 40.1
126% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 321
249% 343 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 147%
Great: 469%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905744-114.A00G 39GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 59 60 15.5" 1536 793 LGD0563
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD Builds (Compare 750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback