Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V17.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.4
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221004
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 13:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 161
2-Core 302
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 935
92% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,179
73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 124
Parallax 11.5
8% 48.6 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 1
6% 8.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00B07 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2040 1945 2007 2132 1805 990 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,167
Write 2,278
Mixed 2,086
SusWrite 1,820
471% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 81
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 114
382% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,510
DQ Write 1,285
DQ Mixed 1,391
1,044% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 379%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 33
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 19.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08B3
Typical ABRA A5 V17.4 Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback