Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221222
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 03:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 354
114% 215 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,076
109% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,931
120% 1,931 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 3006) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3425
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 275
Parallax 11.7
9% 99.3 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.5
10% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 3168 1830 1852 1842 1633 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 4,819
Write 28.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 1,946
366% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 34.7
174% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,510
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 59.4
220% 533 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 397%
Great: 427%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
808GB free
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2229 1130 1170 1123 1156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 2,284
Mixed 1,719
SusWrite 1,490
433% 1,927 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 90.7
275% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,604
DQ Write 1,418
DQ Mixed 1504
1,130% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 333%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 63.3
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 60.4
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 26.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 42 60 16" 1280 720 CSO1624
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback