MSI Z590 PRO WIFI [CEC] (MS-7D09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D09
MotherboardMSI Z590 PRO WIFI [CEC] (MS-7D09)  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 719
70% 577 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3900100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 67 95 66 95 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 502
Write 396
Mixed 415
SusWrite 95.2
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 11.7
88% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 105
121% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 158GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 429 427 430 431 429 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.5% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 423
Mixed 418
SusWrite 430
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 27.3
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 115
129% 214 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 29.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 4R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 59% 32 101 60 144 0" 1920 1080
Typical Z590 PRO WIFI [CEC] (MS-7D09) Builds (Compare 1,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z590 PRO WIFI [CEC] (MS-7D09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback