HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8876
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 99.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,167
106% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,383
86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5050 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.30
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 271
Parallax 295
230% 283 fps
MRender 337
Gravity 238
Splatting 184
199% 253 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-256G-1106 256GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 501 504 508 508 510 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,777
Write 2,068
Mixed 1,518
SusWrite 524
330% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 73.2
254% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 895
722% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 229%
Great: 229%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 493 492 493 493 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 487
Mixed 444
SusWrite 492
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.8
196% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
463GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 471 471 471 471 471 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 358
Write 436
Mixed 258
SusWrite 470
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 35.4
133% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 258
224% 333 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
324GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 471 471 471 471 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 469
Mixed 352
SusWrite 470
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 47.3
169% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 254
223% 332 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AHD22S8G32S AHD22S8G32S AHD22S8G32S Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 37.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 36.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 39.3
102% 39.3 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 32" 2560 1369 IOCFFFF 32C1U
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx Builds (Compare 4,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback