Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P  (all builds)
Memory104.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.30GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 535
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 263
Parallax 327
237% 294 fps
MRender 332
Gravity 229
Splatting 167
190% 243 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 197%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reletech P400 SSD 1024GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM32.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 719 805 793 348 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 702
Write 2,067
Mixed 632
SusWrite 648
230% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.7
147% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 850
672% 941 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 157%
Great: 291%
ssd 512GB
107GB free
Firmware: HPS2704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 325 253 398 398 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 477
Write 407
Mixed 268
SusWrite 312
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 10.6
86% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 13.5
58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
409GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 175
Write 26.6
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 28
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
36GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 59
Write 56.8
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 55.6
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 67%
Samsung HD155UI 1.5TB
386GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 39
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 92.8
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 101 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 55.1
Write 54.1
Mixed 55
SusWrite 99.4
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$48
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 116
72% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$48
589GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 181
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 146
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 101 99 99 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 115
Write 96
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 100
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
12GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 79 80 76 76 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 76.5
Write 74.1
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 74.3
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
185% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7CPR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 50 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5P Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback