HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8308
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 21:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 560
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 60
Parallax 54.8
47% 57.7 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 62
Splatting 56.2
37% 43.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,634
Write 771
Mixed 641
222% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 54.6
179% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 667
496% 662 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Hgst Touro Mobile 3.0 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Read 50.7
Write 26.6
Mixed 21
SusWrite 25.8
7% 31 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
659GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 164 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 163
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 24.5" 1280 720 HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback