HP EliteBook 860 16 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 860 16 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8ABB
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 14:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 66.9
42% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 306
25% 216 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8ABB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.7
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 12.9
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 387 330 137 125 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 711
Mixed 746
SusWrite 259
164% 738 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 28.1
97% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 256
167% 199 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 103%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Kingston 9905801-008.A00G 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 32
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0A32
Typical EliteBook 860 16 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 860 16 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback