TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Microelectronics G714

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicroelectronics G714  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 04:57
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 191
2-Core 373
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 716
8-Core 1,278
120% 997 Pts
64-Core 1,742
108% 1,742 Pts
Poor: 111% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Zotac(19DA 2714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 268
Parallax 284
228% 277 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 241
Splatting 190
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 197%
 Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2483 2571 2548 2745 2746 2709 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,526
Write 2,803
Mixed 2307
SusWrite 2,634
580% 2,568 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 78
312% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,892
DQ Write 1,672
DQ Mixed 1801
1,345% 1,788 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑
This bench: 436%
 Great: 469%
Nextorage NEM-PA4TB 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EIFS31.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4694 4905 4905 4916 4893 4959 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
592% Outstanding
Read 2,752
Write 4,526
Mixed 3075
SusWrite 4,879
866% 3,808 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 102
345% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,774
DQ Write 1,683
DQ Mixed 1,723
1,295% 1,727 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑
This bench: 592%
 Great: 615%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
114GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 26.3
Mixed 40
67% 70 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5200J3636C16G F5-5600J3636C16G F5-5200J3636C16G F5-5600J3636C16G 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 49.9
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 44.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 39.6
118% 41.2 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 129% ↑
This bench: 129%
 Great: 145%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 72.3" 3840 2089 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback