Asus K56CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K56CM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K56CM
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 22:33
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 82.1
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 125
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1587) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.86 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian M280-12 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
Read 509
Write 319
Mixed 398
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 29.8
90% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 67.7
87% 156 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
145GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 76.1
Mixed 76.5
54% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K56CM Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K56CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback