Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 04:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 225
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 326
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 22
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 24
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 512G 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 380 352 296 115 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 383
Write 304
Mixed 329
SusWrite 253
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 24.4
108% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 42.8
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GU7AFR8NVK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 31.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3230 AG323FWG3R3
Typical A320MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback