Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 73 1-Core 112 2-Core 243 77% 143 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 672 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 753 47% 753 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.3% Excellent	Lighting 117 Reflection 134 Parallax 97.4 96% 116 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 90.7 Splatting 79.2 77% 96.5 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 106%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Blueray SSD 512GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: H220906a Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,567 Write 1,743 Mixed 1374 349% 1,562 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 49.1 159% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 829 DQ Mixed 739 591% 828 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 306%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 880GB free Firmware: CC41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 194 Write 182 Mixed 73 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4D8GS3200BS22 2x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 27.8 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 18.7 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	25%	59	307	21	165	24"	1920 1080	AUS24AC VG248

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16