Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 18.3 1-Core 62.1 2-Core 102 32% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 217 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 2,063 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 380E) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 10 5% 8.53 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 5.8 5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1001V3LN SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 336 345 354 401 395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	71% Very good	Read 453 Write 378 Mixed 428 SusWrite 365 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 16.6 66% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 274 193% 250 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 252%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 2x8GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 334 12% 334 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	4%	28	116	19	60	15.5"	1536 793	LEN9051

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 3 7320U GraphicsAMDBench 52%, 1,118 samples	45x
Ryzen 5 7520U GraphicsAMDBench 53%, 1,439 samples	25x
Athlon Silver 7120U GraphicsAMDBench 25%, 130 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 2,063 samples	73x
RadeonT 610MAMDBench 6%, 75 samples	12x

SSD
MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GBMicronBench 174%, 1,136 samples	26x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GBSamsungBench 146%, 356 samples	20x
RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GBUmisBench 123%, 883 samples	12x

RAM
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GBSamsungBench 61%, 958 samples	33x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 2x4GBMicronBench 64%, 254 samples	28x
H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 2x2GBHynixBench 53%, 49 samples	9x