Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 19:37
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 772
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 61
Parallax 19.4
12% 31.7 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 16
Splatting 16.8
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 970
Write 921
Mixed 863
205% 918 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 50.3
159% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 400
342% 485 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
466GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 446
Mixed 402
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 48.9
164% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 202
169% 245 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP002D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback