Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	RD580_ AWRDACPI
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ AT8 32X(ATI RD580-ULI M1575)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '14 at 13:01
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 31.4 2-Core 60.5 21% 46 Pts	4-Core 52.9 8-Core 61.6 8% 57.2 Pts	64-Core 62.8 4% 62.8 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7950 GT 351 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 2219) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 0.62 3% 2.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9091 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2501 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 208 (AE) Unknown 100 100 408 (B5) Unknown 100 100 15977348991569 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 50 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	30% Poor	Read 242 Write 52.5 Mixed 80.8 27% 125 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 5.49 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 43.1 DQ Mixed 8.19 24% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 65%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 478 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Read 14.6 Write 7.57 Mixed 9.1 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 6% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 8%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback