Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZV4
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 16:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 60
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 205
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 724
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 277D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 24.2
15% 37.9 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 19.2
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1002 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1506 1263 1372 1529 1754 1770 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 910
Mixed 1,178
SusWrite 1,532
297% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 25.5
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 468
332% 431 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 214%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 37.2
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 21.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SHP1574 LQ156T1JW05
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback