Clevo W240BU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemClevo W240BU  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W240BU
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Memory 23.4
1-Core 9.3
2-Core 12.1
11% 14.9 Pts
4-Core 10
8-Core 11.8
1% 10.9 Pts
64-Core 9.7
1% 9.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Clevo(1558 4510) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.2
0% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GN64 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS2227F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 62 26 42 77 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 131
Write 43.4
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 58.3
16% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 3.2
16% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS543225L9SA00 250GB-$41
69GB free
Firmware: FBEZC4EC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 35 45 44 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 49
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 42.8
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 2.5
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.5 GB/s
Latency 296
14% 296 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 40 60 19.1" 1280 720 SAM02AD SyncMaster
Typical W240BU Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W240BU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback