HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 158 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 396 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164 6,726 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.2a SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 136 110 99 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 391 Write 211 Mixed 253 SusWrite 117 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 29.9 112% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 236 176% 236 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2490 2490W1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	493x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16