Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Ciara Q87M-DA

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Ciara Q87M-DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570TE 222 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 149 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 224 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.1 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46% Average	Lighting 58.6 Reflection 51.5 Parallax 73.7 48% 61.3 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 38.8 43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geonix Gold 256GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0426A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 367 381 416 412 416 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 460 Write 374 Mixed 359 SusWrite 390 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 26.4 113% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 45.1 90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 87%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 300GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 92 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 88 Write 82.4 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 91.2 56% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.2% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	24.1"	1280 720	DELA07A DELL U2412M

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-DA Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Q87M-DA

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $65Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	16x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	3x
Fury 240GBHyperX $59Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 4x4GBCrucialBench 55%, 50 samples	5x
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 14 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknown-033.A00LFBench 53%, 182 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350