HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8955
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 42.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 284
82% 162 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 691
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8955) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4274
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 13
Parallax 9.8
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 0
5% 7.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D256-HP 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L482
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1118 1270 836 465 463 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 2,174
Write 1,174
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 769
296% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 32.2
173% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 363
288% 407 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 204%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 9.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 22% 9 63 29 60 21.5" 1920 1080 LEN62A7 C22-20
Typical Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback